{"id":733,"date":"2007-11-21T17:40:23","date_gmt":"2007-11-21T23:40:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/austringer.net\/wp\/index.php\/2007\/11\/21\/behe-and-astrology\/"},"modified":"2007-11-21T17:40:23","modified_gmt":"2007-11-21T23:40:23","slug":"behe-and-astrology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/austringer.net\/wp\/index.php\/2007\/11\/21\/behe-and-astrology\/","title":{"rendered":"Behe and Astrology"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over on Ed Brayton&#8217;s &#8220;Dispatches from the Culture Wars&#8221;, Ed comments on NOVA&#8217;s attention paid to Behe saying that astrology qualifies as science under his definition of science. This is a comment I left there:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nAt the time when astrology was of a similar status to other live theories, it wasn&#8217;t called &#8220;science&#8221;, it was just a branch of philosophy. The philosophy of science has changed over time, which means that the things that once qualified as fitting within science may not do so at a later time. <\/p>\n<p>It is within this understanding of science that Behe&#8217;s re-definition of science itself and the discussion of astrology can be usefully approached. Whether astrology might have been considered a live option historically doesn&#8217;t change the basic facts: a modern definition of science has no place for a mechanism-less &#8220;theory&#8221;, and Behe&#8217;s re-definition of science essentially reverts us back to a pre-19th century natural philosophy that can&#8217;t distinguish between explanations with testable mechanisms and those without.<\/p>\n<p>IMO, that&#8217;s the real problem with the Behe\/astrology issue, and I don&#8217;t think that it is readily amenable to sound-bite presentation on TV. It certainly wasn&#8217;t explained adequately in the program, judging by the commentary that has resulted.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over on Ed Brayton&#8217;s &#8220;Dispatches from the Culture Wars&#8221;, Ed comments on NOVA&#8217;s attention paid to Behe saying that astrology<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","footnotes":""},"categories":[4,9,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-733","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-antievolution","category-law-and-politics","category-science"],"magazineBlocksPostFeaturedMedia":{"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false,"colormag-highlighted-post":false,"colormag-featured-post-medium":false,"colormag-featured-post-small":false,"colormag-featured-image":false,"colormag-default-news":false,"colormag-featured-image-large":false},"magazineBlocksPostAuthor":{"name":"Wesley R. Elsberry","avatar":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0397e612e6e0615428fba05fe25422d5920a74e203aa8a035183297dcb4ffe5e?s=96&r=g"},"magazineBlocksPostCommentsNumber":false,"magazineBlocksPostExcerpt":"Over on Ed Brayton&#8217;s &#8220;Dispatches from the Culture Wars&#8221;, Ed comments on NOVA&#8217;s attention paid to Behe saying that astrology","magazineBlocksPostCategories":["Antievolution","Law and Politics","Science"],"magazineBlocksPostViewCount":45,"magazineBlocksPostReadTime":2,"magazine_blocks_featured_image_url":{"full":false,"medium":false,"thumbnail":false},"magazine_blocks_author":{"display_name":"Wesley R. Elsberry","author_link":"https:\/\/austringer.net\/wp\/index.php\/author\/austringer\/"},"magazine_blocks_comment":4,"magazine_blocks_author_image":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0397e612e6e0615428fba05fe25422d5920a74e203aa8a035183297dcb4ffe5e?s=96&r=g","magazine_blocks_category":"<a href=\"#\" class=\"category-link category-link-4\">Antievolution<\/a> <a href=\"#\" class=\"category-link category-link-9\">Law and Politics<\/a> <a href=\"#\" class=\"category-link category-link-5\">Science<\/a>","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/austringer.net\/wp\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/733","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/austringer.net\/wp\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/austringer.net\/wp\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/austringer.net\/wp\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/austringer.net\/wp\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=733"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/austringer.net\/wp\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/733\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/austringer.net\/wp\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=733"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/austringer.net\/wp\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=733"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/austringer.net\/wp\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=733"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}