<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Austringer &#187; Antievolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/category/antievolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austringer.net/wp</link>
	<description>Wesley R. Elsberry&#039;s personal weblog, talking about falconry, science, antievolution, computation, and the broken body he lives in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 04:50:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Time Article on Coppedge v. JPL</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2012/03/19/time-article-on-coppedge-v-jpl/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2012/03/19/time-article-on-coppedge-v-jpl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time&#8217;s web page has an article up by Jeffrey Kluger. Kluger is a lawyer and relates his reaction to the briefs filed in the case of David Coppedge v. Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Caltech. Groups like the intelligent design community are not always free to pick their poster children, and it&#8217;s unfortunate for them that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2012/03/19/time-article-on-coppedge-v-jpl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ID and Science in the Dover Decision</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2012/03/10/id-and-science-in-the-dover-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2012/03/10/id-and-science-in-the-dover-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran across a link to a blog post from 2007 by Jeff Shallit. One of the commenters there took exception to Jeff&#8217;s statement that the KvD case was primarily about religion, noting that a lot of the decision in the case discusses science. I was five years late to the party, but I felt [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2012/03/10/id-and-science-in-the-dover-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Analysis, Critically Analyzed</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2012/02/09/critical-analysis-critically-analyzed/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2012/02/09/critical-analysis-critically-analyzed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Eugenie Scott is giving a public talk Thursday, February 9, 2012, at the University of South Florida in Tampa. The topic is on the &#8220;critical analysis&#8221; legislative efforts that have popped up in Florida, and how these are part and parcel of the creationism movement. The location is FAH 101 and the time for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2012/02/09/critical-analysis-critically-analyzed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Educating Casey on Publishing</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/09/16/educating-casey-on-publishing/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/09/16/educating-casey-on-publishing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve known for a long time that Casey Luskin has some very odd ideas about what constitutes a technical publication. Casey&#8217;s been good enough to document another deficiency of his in this respect for all to see, but no one is allowed to comment. (I wonder what happened to the Discovery Institute&#8217;s grand experiment in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/09/16/educating-casey-on-publishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revising Assessment of Clayton Williams, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/09/02/revising-assessment-of-clayton-williams-jr/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/09/02/revising-assessment-of-clayton-williams-jr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in 1990, Clayton Williams, Jr. was in the news a lot as he ran for governor in Texas. His campaign famously imploded over insensitive good-ol&#8217;-boy comments made to a weekend gathering of media. He was rich, but there didn&#8217;t seem to be much else to recommend him. I always thought it odd to go [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/09/02/revising-assessment-of-clayton-williams-jr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Casey Luskin Doesn&#8217;t Do It Again</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/22/casey-luskin-doesnt-do-it-again/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/22/casey-luskin-doesnt-do-it-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 05:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Casey Luskin has an unenviable track record. Pretty much anytime Casey gets going, you can count on him to shoot himself in the foot someway, somehow. Yesterday evening&#8217;s blog post by Casey is no exception. So if Casey has done it again, why would I give the title I have? Well, because of the way [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/22/casey-luskin-doesnt-do-it-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Did Jesus Say to Put a Nail in the Tire?</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/19/where-did-jesus-say-to-put-a-nail-in-the-tire/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/19/where-did-jesus-say-to-put-a-nail-in-the-tire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two vehicles in a Bartram Hall (Zoology department building) parking area at the University of Florida were vandalized, apparently because they displayed &#8220;Darwin fish&#8221; on them. Besides messing up the Darwin fish, the vandal(s) put nails into tires. Hat tip to Prof. Betty Smocovitis, whose hand appears in the linked video.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/19/where-did-jesus-say-to-put-a-nail-in-the-tire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Reason: A Ouija Board?</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/07/good-reason-a-ouija-board/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/07/good-reason-a-ouija-board/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an essay by Randal Rauser at &#8220;Christian Post&#8221; offering what&#8217;s termed a rebuttal to a criticism of an earlier essay. Rauser seems to be a run-of-the-mill &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; creationism (IDC) cheerleader. Rauser defends Dembski&#8217;s ideas early on. Joseph H. Axell posted a long rebuttal in the comment section of my article &#8220;Unintelligent arguments against [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/07/good-reason-a-ouija-board/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magical Mathematical Metrics: Intelligent Design Hijinks</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/26/magical-mathematical-metrics-intelligent-design-hijinks/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/26/magical-mathematical-metrics-intelligent-design-hijinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 23:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at the &#8220;Uncommon Descent&#8221; blog, poster &#8220;niwrad&#8221; decided to dispute claims of high sequence similarity between human and chimpanzee genomes. &#8220;niwrad&#8221; posted a statistical test of human/chimp genome comparisons in September, 2010, and a follow-up post this week comparing two human genomes using the metric from the earlier post. These were brought to my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/26/magical-mathematical-metrics-intelligent-design-hijinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Synthese Editors-in-Chief Respond to a Petition</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/14/the-synthese-editors-in-chief-respond-to-a-petition/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/14/the-synthese-editors-in-chief-respond-to-a-petition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 04:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The main petition regarding the Synthese disclaimer published in the January, 2011 issue was signed by 470 academics. It asked for a retraction of the disclaimer and additional information about the circumstances that led the Editors-in-Chief (EiC) to include it. The EiC have now provided a response to the main petition. I received no direct [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/14/the-synthese-editors-in-chief-respond-to-a-petition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

