<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Austringer &#187; Antievolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/category/antievolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austringer.net/wp</link>
	<description>Wesley R. Elsberry&#039;s personal weblog, talking about falconry, science, antievolution, computation, and the broken body he lives in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:58:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Educating Casey on Publishing</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/09/16/educating-casey-on-publishing/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/09/16/educating-casey-on-publishing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve known for a long time that Casey Luskin has some very odd ideas about what constitutes a technical publication. Casey&#8217;s been good enough to document another deficiency of his in this respect for all to see, but no one is allowed to comment. (I wonder what happened to the Discovery Institute&#8217;s grand experiment in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/09/16/educating-casey-on-publishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revising Assessment of Clayton Williams, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/09/02/revising-assessment-of-clayton-williams-jr/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/09/02/revising-assessment-of-clayton-williams-jr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in 1990, Clayton Williams, Jr. was in the news a lot as he ran for governor in Texas. His campaign famously imploded over insensitive good-ol&#8217;-boy comments made to a weekend gathering of media. He was rich, but there didn&#8217;t seem to be much else to recommend him. I always thought it odd to go [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/09/02/revising-assessment-of-clayton-williams-jr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Casey Luskin Doesn&#8217;t Do It Again</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/22/casey-luskin-doesnt-do-it-again/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/22/casey-luskin-doesnt-do-it-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 05:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Casey Luskin has an unenviable track record. Pretty much anytime Casey gets going, you can count on him to shoot himself in the foot someway, somehow. Yesterday evening&#8217;s blog post by Casey is no exception. So if Casey has done it again, why would I give the title I have? Well, because of the way [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/22/casey-luskin-doesnt-do-it-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Did Jesus Say to Put a Nail in the Tire?</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/19/where-did-jesus-say-to-put-a-nail-in-the-tire/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/19/where-did-jesus-say-to-put-a-nail-in-the-tire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two vehicles in a Bartram Hall (Zoology department building) parking area at the University of Florida were vandalized, apparently because they displayed &#8220;Darwin fish&#8221; on them. Besides messing up the Darwin fish, the vandal(s) put nails into tires. Hat tip to Prof. Betty Smocovitis, whose hand appears in the linked video. Viewed 125555 times by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/19/where-did-jesus-say-to-put-a-nail-in-the-tire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Reason: A Ouija Board?</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/07/good-reason-a-ouija-board/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/07/good-reason-a-ouija-board/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an essay by Randal Rauser at &#8220;Christian Post&#8221; offering what&#8217;s termed a rebuttal to a criticism of an earlier essay. Rauser seems to be a run-of-the-mill &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; creationism (IDC) cheerleader. Rauser defends Dembski&#8217;s ideas early on. Joseph H. Axell posted a long rebuttal in the comment section of my article &#8220;Unintelligent arguments against [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/07/07/good-reason-a-ouija-board/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magical Mathematical Metrics: Intelligent Design Hijinks</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/26/magical-mathematical-metrics-intelligent-design-hijinks/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/26/magical-mathematical-metrics-intelligent-design-hijinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 23:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at the &#8220;Uncommon Descent&#8221; blog, poster &#8220;niwrad&#8221; decided to dispute claims of high sequence similarity between human and chimpanzee genomes. &#8220;niwrad&#8221; posted a statistical test of human/chimp genome comparisons in September, 2010, and a follow-up post this week comparing two human genomes using the metric from the earlier post. These were brought to my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/26/magical-mathematical-metrics-intelligent-design-hijinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Synthese Editors-in-Chief Respond to a Petition</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/14/the-synthese-editors-in-chief-respond-to-a-petition/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/14/the-synthese-editors-in-chief-respond-to-a-petition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 04:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The main petition regarding the Synthese disclaimer published in the January, 2011 issue was signed by 470 academics. It asked for a retraction of the disclaimer and additional information about the circumstances that led the Editors-in-Chief (EiC) to include it. The EiC have now provided a response to the main petition. I received no direct [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/14/the-synthese-editors-in-chief-respond-to-a-petition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions, Francis Beckwith, and a Tangible Absence of Answers</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/07/questions-francis-beckwith-and-a-tangible-absence-of-answers/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/07/questions-francis-beckwith-and-a-tangible-absence-of-answers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 11:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, this is yet another bit related to the Synthese flap. One of the issues still outstanding is whether the list of things the Editors-in-Chief have as misconduct includes notifying third-party complainers that the disclaimer was going into the print edition long before the print edition was available. They certainly failed to inform either the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/05/07/questions-francis-beckwith-and-a-tangible-absence-of-answers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petition for Synthese to Retract the Disclaimer</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/04/27/petition-for-synthese-to-retract-the-disclaimer/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/04/27/petition-for-synthese-to-retract-the-disclaimer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just in case there&#8217;s any academics who haven&#8217;t gotten the word yet, there&#8217;s a petition going requesting four things of the Synthese Editors-in-Chief, including the retraction of the vague disclaimer that tarnishes the whole special issue on &#8220;Evolution and its rvials&#8221;. If you aren&#8217;t on board with one or more of the items, that can [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/04/27/petition-for-synthese-to-retract-the-disclaimer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religious Antievolutionists and Civility: Paul Giem</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/04/25/religious-antievolutionists-and-civility-paul-giem/</link>
		<comments>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/04/25/religious-antievolutionists-and-civility-paul-giem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=2445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor Paul Giem, M.D., of Loma Linda University has a batch of video lectures online. One of them has him discussing the Synthese special issue on &#8220;Evolution and its rivals&#8221;, with special attention given to Prof. Barbara Forrest&#8217;s paper and Prof. Francis Beckwith&#8217;s response. Giem really, really doesn&#8217;t like Forrest&#8217;s article. At 28:49 into the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2011/04/25/religious-antievolutionists-and-civility-paul-giem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

