Mark Lance makes an excellent point over at “New APPS” concerning the Synthese disclaimer flap. I think it deserves more notice than simply being part of a longish stream of comments.
<= get_option(\'vc_tag\') ?>> = get_option(\'vc_text_before\') ?> 55810 = get_option(\'vc_human_count_text_many\') ?> = get_option(\'vc_preposition\') ?> 6875 = get_option(\'vc_human_viewers_text_many\') ?> = get_option(\'vc_tag\') ?>>
So, all in all, I’m still looking for anything that is remotely a candidate for exclusion on the grounds of unprofessional rudeness. Again, if the issue is that the arguments are bad, then the paper should have been rejected on those grounds. But if editors start saying that it is unprofessional to draw negative conclusions about people who are engaged in debates with obvious and dire political consequences, then we need to be aware that they are taking a stand in favor of philosophical irrelevancy.