<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Signature in the Cell&#8221; Tampa: Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2010/01/29/signature-in-the-cell-tampa-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2010/01/29/signature-in-the-cell-tampa-part-1/</link>
	<description>Wesley R. Elsberry&#039;s personal weblog, talking about falconry, science, antievolution, computation, and the broken body he lives in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:09:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Farrell</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2010/01/29/signature-in-the-cell-tampa-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-312640</link>
		<dc:creator>John Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=1942#comment-312640</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Over at BioLogos, Darrel Falk and probably the other leaders there maintain that the ID folks are not liars and deceivers, just misguided.&lt;/i&gt;

This is a major problem that certain Christian groups (the Biologos scientists, conservative William F. Buckley style Catholics, reform and evangelical Christians) are very reluctant to deal with. But sooner or later I think they are going to have to acknowledge and repudiate the intellectual dishonesty at the heart of the entire intelligent design program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Over at BioLogos, Darrel Falk and probably the other leaders there maintain that the ID folks are not liars and deceivers, just misguided.</i></p>
<p>This is a major problem that certain Christian groups (the Biologos scientists, conservative William F. Buckley style Catholics, reform and evangelical Christians) are very reluctant to deal with. But sooner or later I think they are going to have to acknowledge and repudiate the intellectual dishonesty at the heart of the entire intelligent design program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austringer</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2010/01/29/signature-in-the-cell-tampa-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-312638</link>
		<dc:creator>Austringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=1942#comment-312638</guid>
		<description>I think that it is hard for many advocates who push themselves as being experts whose opinion others can trust to escape the inference that are knowingly telling falsehoods. It is one thing for one IDC cheerleader to mislead another IDC cheerleader when they are just exchanging bits of ignorance. When, though, a professional IDC advocate claims to know what they are talking about and nonetheless keeps repeating the same error they&#039;ve been repeatedly corrected on, you pretty much know that they are pulling your leg, either about the content or their pretension to expertise.

I got into this back in 1986 because I was &lt;i&gt;incensed&lt;/i&gt; that people like Henry M. Morris would tell falsehood after falsehood while claiming the mantle of Christian brotherhood. It seemed to me that I had to be vocal in my rebuttals to religious antievolution ideas lest my belief be taken as complicity in what those folks were doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it is hard for many advocates who push themselves as being experts whose opinion others can trust to escape the inference that are knowingly telling falsehoods. It is one thing for one IDC cheerleader to mislead another IDC cheerleader when they are just exchanging bits of ignorance. When, though, a professional IDC advocate claims to know what they are talking about and nonetheless keeps repeating the same error they&#8217;ve been repeatedly corrected on, you pretty much know that they are pulling your leg, either about the content or their pretension to expertise.</p>
<p>I got into this back in 1986 because I was <i>incensed</i> that people like Henry M. Morris would tell falsehood after falsehood while claiming the mantle of Christian brotherhood. It seemed to me that I had to be vocal in my rebuttals to religious antievolution ideas lest my belief be taken as complicity in what those folks were doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen S.</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2010/01/29/signature-in-the-cell-tampa-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-312637</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=1942#comment-312637</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m looking forward to the full report also. 

I also have a question-- in your opinion, do the leaders in the ID movement deliberately lie and deceive?  Over at BioLogos, Darrel Falk and probably the other leaders there maintain that the ID folks are not liars and deceivers, just misguided.  My own thought is that it&#039;s perhaps very difficult to acknowledge that a fellow Christian would deliberately deceive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to the full report also. </p>
<p>I also have a question&#8211; in your opinion, do the leaders in the ID movement deliberately lie and deceive?  Over at BioLogos, Darrel Falk and probably the other leaders there maintain that the ID folks are not liars and deceivers, just misguided.  My own thought is that it&#8217;s perhaps very difficult to acknowledge that a fellow Christian would deliberately deceive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Duigon</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2010/01/29/signature-in-the-cell-tampa-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-312636</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Duigon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=1942#comment-312636</guid>
		<description>Intelligent Design is not Creationism
like
Homeopathy is not Quackery.

Many Creationists do not hold to a 6-day event 6,000 years ago, without denying they are Creationists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intelligent Design is not Creationism<br />
like<br />
Homeopathy is not Quackery.</p>
<p>Many Creationists do not hold to a 6-day event 6,000 years ago, without denying they are Creationists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBH</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2010/01/29/signature-in-the-cell-tampa-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-312635</link>
		<dc:creator>RBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=1942#comment-312635</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to the full report ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to the full report &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
