<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Florida: Press Conference to Oppose False &#8220;Academic Freedom&#8221; and &#8220;Critical Analysis&#8221; Bills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2008/04/14/florida-press-conference-to-oppose-false-academic-freedom-and-critical-analysis-bills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2008/04/14/florida-press-conference-to-oppose-false-academic-freedom-and-critical-analysis-bills/</link>
	<description>Wesley R. Elsberry&#039;s personal weblog, talking about falconry, science, antievolution, computation, and the broken body he lives in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:12:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirula</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2008/04/14/florida-press-conference-to-oppose-false-academic-freedom-and-critical-analysis-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-188140</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2008/04/14/florida-press-conference-to-oppose-false-academic-freedom-and-critical-analysis-bills/#comment-188140</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;also pretend that the age of the earth doesn’t matter in science education&lt;/i&gt;

Which reminds me, why are the geology classes left off the &quot;manufactroversy&quot; list?  Certainly Lyell&#039;s geology text was a major influence on Darwin&#039;s ideas about evolution.  Without the &quot;old earth&quot; evidence, Darwin&#039;s ideas would have probably fallen on deaf ears.

Either they haven&#039;t figured it out or it&#039;s not as inflammatory as &quot;your monkey&#039;s uncle&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>also pretend that the age of the earth doesn’t matter in science education</i></p>
<p>Which reminds me, why are the geology classes left off the &#8220;manufactroversy&#8221; list?  Certainly Lyell&#8217;s geology text was a major influence on Darwin&#8217;s ideas about evolution.  Without the &#8220;old earth&#8221; evidence, Darwin&#8217;s ideas would have probably fallen on deaf ears.</p>
<p>Either they haven&#8217;t figured it out or it&#8217;s not as inflammatory as &#8220;your monkey&#8217;s uncle&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austringer</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2008/04/14/florida-press-conference-to-oppose-false-academic-freedom-and-critical-analysis-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-188139</link>
		<dc:creator>Austringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2008/04/14/florida-press-conference-to-oppose-false-academic-freedom-and-critical-analysis-bills/#comment-188139</guid>
		<description>I did notice an inaccuracy in Dr. Kroto&#039;s presentation when he attributed an argument that the Grand Canyon was itself merely 5,000 years old to the Discovery Institute. The Discovery Institute, of course, does not &lt;i&gt;endorse&lt;/i&gt; young-earth creationist arguments about the age of the earth or even the Grand Canyon. That argument actually belongs to organizations like the Institute for Creation Research and Answers in Genesis. Instead, the Discovery Institute merely wishes that everyone would pretend along with them that science can&#039;t decide between a young-earth chronology and 4.55 billion years (or a few thousand and several million years in the case of the Grand Canyon), and also pretend that the age of the earth doesn&#039;t matter in science education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did notice an inaccuracy in Dr. Kroto&#8217;s presentation when he attributed an argument that the Grand Canyon was itself merely 5,000 years old to the Discovery Institute. The Discovery Institute, of course, does not <i>endorse</i> young-earth creationist arguments about the age of the earth or even the Grand Canyon. That argument actually belongs to organizations like the Institute for Creation Research and Answers in Genesis. Instead, the Discovery Institute merely wishes that everyone would pretend along with them that science can&#8217;t decide between a young-earth chronology and 4.55 billion years (or a few thousand and several million years in the case of the Grand Canyon), and also pretend that the age of the earth doesn&#8217;t matter in science education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Scott</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2008/04/14/florida-press-conference-to-oppose-false-academic-freedom-and-critical-analysis-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-188132</link>
		<dc:creator>S Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2008/04/14/florida-press-conference-to-oppose-false-academic-freedom-and-critical-analysis-bills/#comment-188132</guid>
		<description>Oooh! Thank you, thank you, thank you for speaking in Tallahassee today! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh! Thank you, thank you, thank you for speaking in Tallahassee today! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

