4 thoughts on “Intelligent Design and the Family

  1. Austringer

    If the IDC advocates were smart about this, they’d simply make a comment about how “ID has become a culturally pervasive term; look out, you Darwinists!”

    I expect that they won’t be able to leave it at that. So, let’s have a pool on possible responses:

    (1) Casey Luskin complains that the SF adoption people “do not understand ID”.

    (2) John West complains that the SF adoption people are stealing the DI’s valuable intellectual property.

    (3) Bruce Chapman complains that “ID theorists” are “no friends of” alternative lifestyles.

    (4) David DeWolf sues the SF campaign for mental anguish.

  2. Torbjörn Larsson, OM

    Or,
    (5) Dave Scot bans the poster.

  3. vetiver

    Or,
    (5) Dave Scot bans the poster.

    Unless the lesbians agree to make out and let him watch.

  4. Nigel Depledge

    Or, (6), Dembski says “ID is not that kind of theory”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *