<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ohio Wakes Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2006/02/15/ohio-wakes-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2006/02/15/ohio-wakes-up/</link>
	<description>Wesley R. Elsberry's personal weblog, talking about falconry, science, antievolution, computation, and the broken body he lives in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:12:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike H.</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2006/02/15/ohio-wakes-up/comment-page-1/#comment-16292</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=224#comment-16292</guid>
		<description>In SC, the Education Oversight Committee voted to reject the Grade 10 standards on evolutionary biology and sent a proposed &quot;compromise&quot; version to the State Board of Ed., which includes the infamous &quot;critcally analyze&quot; language.  This was in spite of the clear objections of Inez Tennenbaum, the State Superintendent of Education  who is an ex-officio member of the EOC (and has a background in law).  

So the science ed. folks are now setting up strategies for the next Board of Ed. public hearing, which I believe is scheduled for early March.

There are several SC newspapers that are keeping track of these developments, but Chris Dixon of the Charleston Post and Courier probably has done the best job of reporting the latest developments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In SC, the Education Oversight Committee voted to reject the Grade 10 standards on evolutionary biology and sent a proposed &#8220;compromise&#8221; version to the State Board of Ed., which includes the infamous &#8220;critcally analyze&#8221; language.  This was in spite of the clear objections of Inez Tennenbaum, the State Superintendent of Education  who is an ex-officio member of the EOC (and has a background in law).  </p>
<p>So the science ed. folks are now setting up strategies for the next Board of Ed. public hearing, which I believe is scheduled for early March.</p>
<p>There are several SC newspapers that are keeping track of these developments, but Chris Dixon of the Charleston Post and Courier probably has done the best job of reporting the latest developments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD</title>
		<link>http://austringer.net/wp/index.php/2006/02/15/ohio-wakes-up/comment-page-1/#comment-16288</link>
		<dc:creator>AD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austringer.net/wp/?p=224#comment-16288</guid>
		<description>On the topic of the next battleground for ID in the last paragraph, what is the word on SC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the topic of the next battleground for ID in the last paragraph, what is the word on SC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
