Antievolution Wesley R. Elsberry on 05 May 2005 02:26 am
Over on Bill Dembski’s weblog, a couple of people banned for bad behavior from the Panda’s Thumb weblog were claiming that they were censored at PT, therefore Dr. Dembski could do anything that he wanted to with comments on his blog. Other than utilizing moral relativism, the two were wrong at another level, as I documented in a comment made to that thread.
<= get_option(\'vc_tag\') ?>> = get_option(\'vc_text_before\') ?> 4462 = get_option(\'vc_human_count_text_many\') ?> = get_option(\'vc_preposition\') ?> 1600 = get_option(\'vc_human_viewers_text_many\') ?> = get_option(\'vc_tag\') ?>>
Panda’s Thumb Comment Integrity Policy:
“6. Posting under multiple identities or falsely posting as someone else may lead to removal of affected comments and blocking of the IP address from which those comments were posted, at the discretion of the management.
Simply put, donâ€™t make a jerk out of yourself.”
“Evolving Apeman” writes:
“My comments and IP address were censored at Pandaâ€™s Thumb without good reason (and without explanation). If the â€œpremierâ€ pro-neo-Darwinism site is unwilling to allow dissenting viewpoints, why should this site either?”
This is incorrect. There are two comments that explain why “Evolving Apeman” was banned. In between posting as “Andrew Rule, MD” and “Evolving Apeman”, “Evolving Apeman” had a go at posting as “Great White Wonder”, which is an alias used by another PT commenter. I can’t speak to the prevalence of deletions of comments, since each contributor at PT manages their own threads, but I can say that “Evolving Apeman” was quite prolific for someone who claims to have been censored, and quite a lot of his material remains online there.
“Trying to escape that treatment I resorted to using randomly selected names. I was then banned for using multiple names.”
This is incorrect. “DaveScot” was not banned for simply using multiple names; he was banned for making threats against PT and also posting under another person’s name. “Scott Page” is not a pseudonym, but rather an actual person who posts at PT from time to time. Was “Scott Page” “randomly selected” as a posting alias? Apply your EF/DI, Bill, and use a local probability bound. Here’s the data showing that “DaveScot” was well aware of the use of the name “Scott Page”: 1, 2, 3, and 4. The “DaveScot” corpus of material posted at PT is available for review.
PT doesn’t ask much of commenters, not even that they agree with us, given some (very) small modicum of decorum. But there are some behaviors that shouldn’t be tolerated anywhere, and both “Evolving Apeman” and “DaveScot” violated a clearly stated rule at PT.
17 Responses to “Censorship at PT? I Don’t Think So.”